Airline Services (ATSG) Profits Expected to Increase: What to Know Before Next Week’s Release

Wall Street expects year-over-year profit growth on higher revenues when Air Transport Services (ATSG) releases results for the quarter ended September 2021. Although this widely known consensus prospect is Important in assessing a company’s earnings position, a powerful factor that could affect its stock price in the short term is how actual results compare to those estimates.

The earnings report, due to be released on November 4, 2021, could help the stock rise if those key numbers are better than expectations. On the other hand, if they run out, the stock may go down.

While management’s discussion of trading conditions when calling for profits will primarily determine the sustainability of the immediate price change and future profit expectations, it is worth having a crippling insight into the chances of a surprise. BPA positive.

Zacks consensus estimate

This air freight company is expected to post quarterly earnings of $ 0.46 per share in its next report, which represents a year-over-year change of + 4.6%.

Revenue is expected to reach $ 429.65 million, up 6.3% from the prior year quarter.

Trend of estimated revisions

The consensus EPS estimate for the quarter has remained unchanged over the past 30 days. This essentially reflects how hedge analysts collectively reassessed their initial estimates during this time period.

Investors should be aware that the direction of revisions to estimates by individual coverage analysts may not always be reflected in the overall change.

Price, consensus and EPS Surprise

Whisper of gains

Revisions to estimates before a company’s earnings are released provide clues to business conditions for the period in which the results are released. Our exclusive surprise prediction model – the Zacks Earnings ESP (Expected Surprise Prediction) – has this idea at its heart.

Zacks Earnings ESP compares the most accurate estimate to Zacks’ consensus estimate for the quarter; most accurate estimate is a more recent version of the Zacks Consensus EPS estimate. The idea here is that analysts who revise their estimates just before the results are released have the latest information, which could potentially be more accurate than they and other consensus contributors predicted earlier.

Thus, a positive or negative ESP reading of earnings theoretically indicates the likely deviation of actual earnings from the consensus estimate. However, the predictive power of the model is only significant for positive ESP readings.

A positive ESP on earnings is a good predictor of a pace of earnings, especially when combined with a Zacks # 1 (strong buy), 2 (buy), or 3 (hold) ranking. Our research shows that stocks with this combination produce positive surprise almost 70% of the time, and a strong Zacks ranking actually increases the predictive power of ESP for earnings.

Please note that a negative ESP reading of earnings is not indicative of a shortfall. Our research shows that it is difficult to predict an increase in earnings with any degree of confidence for stocks with negative earnings ESP readings and / or a Zacks ranking of 4 (sell) or 5 (strong sell).

How have the figures evolved for air transport services?

For air transport services, the most accurate estimate is the same as Zacks ‘consensus estimate, suggesting that there are no recent analysts’ opinions that differ from what has been stated. considered to derive the consensus estimate. This resulted in an ESP on earnings of 0%.

On the other hand, the action currently carries a Zacks rank of # 3.

Thus, this combination makes it difficult to predict conclusively that air transport services will exceed the consensus EPS estimate.

Does the history of earnings surprises contain a clue?

When calculating estimates of a company’s future earnings, analysts often consider how well it has been able to match past consensus estimates. So it’s worth taking a look at the surprise history to gauge its influence on the upcoming issue.

For the last quarter published, Air Transport Services was forecast to post a profit of $ 0.26 per share when it actually produced a profit of $ 0.35, offering a surprise of + 34.62%.

In the past four quarters, the company has beaten consensus EPS estimates three times.

Final result

A gain or failure of gains may not be the only basis for a stock to move higher or lower. Many stocks end up losing ground despite declining earnings due to other factors that disappoint investors. Likewise, unforeseen catalysts help a number of stocks win despite a shortfall.

That said, betting on stocks that are expected to exceed profit expectations increases the chances of success. That’s why it’s worth checking out a company’s ESP results and Zacks rankings before it’s released quarterly. Be sure to use our ESP Earnings Filter to uncover the best stocks to buy or sell before they get published.

Air Transport Services does not appear to be a convincing candidate in terms of earnings. However, investors should also pay attention to other factors when betting on this stock or staying on the sidelines before its results are released.

Bitcoin, like the internet itself, could change everything

Blockchain and cryptocurrency have sparked one of the most exciting talking points in a generation. Some call it the “Internet of Money” and predict that it could change the way money works forever. If this is true, it could do to banks what Netflix did to Blockbuster and Amazon to Sears. Experts agree that we are in the early stages of this technology and as it develops it will create several investment opportunities.

Zacks just revealed 3 companies that can help investors capitalize on the explosive profit potential of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies with much less volatility than buying them directly.

See 3 Crypto Related Stocks Now >>

Click to get this free report

Air Transport Services Group, Inc (ATSG): Free Inventory Analysis Report

To read this article on Zacks.com, click here.

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.

Comments are closed.